15 August. The MEDiscuss CDSS is soft-launching today, built for the units, the drugs and the guidance we actually use in Indian wards.

Pyrexia of Unknown Origin

Classification, Staged Investigation and Directed Workup for Classic, Nosocomial, Neutropenic and HIV-Associated PUO · v1
How to use this tool: For fever above 38.3 C (101 F) persisting beyond three weeks, or beyond three days of investigation in hospital, without a diagnosis. Enter the findings so far. The tool sorts the case into one of the four Durack and Street categories, checks that the basic workup is finished before suggesting anything expensive, and then points the search at whichever clues you have found.
Fever of less than 14 days is not PUO. Most prolonged fever in India settles or declares itself within a fortnight. Working it up as PUO that early means expensive tests with a low yield. Use the Acute Undifferentiated Febrile Illness Pathway for the first two weeks; it sequences tests by day of illness.

1. Patient and Fever Characteristics

2. Setting and Host

3. Potentially Diagnostic Clues

These turn an undirected search into a directed one. Tick only what you have actually found. Leaving everything blank is a legitimate answer and the tool will tell you what to do about it. Examine again in a week: the clue that decides the case is often absent at the first look.

Ask these again at every visit. Patients rarely volunteer them.

4. Investigations Already Completed

Nothing advanced is suggested until the first stage is complete. The commonest error in PUO practice is not a missed advanced test, it is a CT ordered while the blood cultures are still pending. Tick only what has been done and reported.
Reading this table. The four groups below account for the great majority of classic PUO. The proportions differ between series and between countries, and they have shifted over time as imaging improved. What has not changed in Indian series is that infection remains the largest single group, and that tuberculosis, much of it extrapulmonary, is the commonest single infection.

1. Infection

CauseWhat should raise itTest that settles it
Tuberculosis, extrapulmonaryWeight loss, night sweats, lymphadenopathy, serosal effusion, normal chest filmTissue: node, pleura, peritoneum, marrow. Send for GeneXpert, culture and histopathology, not histopathology alone
Deep or occult abscessRecent surgery, diverticular or hepatobiliary disease, localised tendernessCECT abdomen and pelvis
Infective endocarditisMurmur, prosthetic valve, dental work, injecting drug use, embolic phenomenaThree sets of blood cultures then echocardiography, transoesophageal if suspicion persists
Enteric fever, relapsing or partially treatedPrior antibiotics, abdominal symptoms, relative bradycardiaBlood culture, bone marrow culture if already on antibiotics
BrucellosisLivestock contact, unpasteurised milk, sacroiliitis, undulant patternSerology plus prolonged blood culture, tell the laboratory it is suspected
MelioidosisDiabetes, soil or water exposure, coastal or paddy-field regions, abscesses in several organsCulture of blood, pus or sputum, tell the laboratory it is suspected
Visceral leishmaniasisEndemic area, marked splenomegaly, pancytopenia, hypergammaglobulinaemiarK39 rapid test, splenic or marrow aspirate
HIV and its opportunistic infectionsAny PUO, whether or not risk factors are volunteeredHIV test in every case, then CD4-directed workup
Osteomyelitis, including spinalFocal bone or spinal tenderness, prior bacteraemiaMRI of the region, then image-guided biopsy and culture

2. Malignancy

CauseWhat should raise itTest that settles it
LymphomaLymphadenopathy, night sweats, weight loss, raised LDH, cytopeniasExcision biopsy of a whole node. Fine needle aspiration is not adequate to classify lymphoma
Leukaemia and myelodysplasiaCytopenias, blasts on film, bone painBone marrow aspirate and biopsy
Renal cell carcinomaHaematuria, raised ESR, anaemia, flank massCECT abdomen
Hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastasesCirrhosis, hepatomegaly, deranged liver profileTriple-phase CT or MRI liver
Atrial myxomaPositional symptoms, embolic events, raised ESR, murmur varying with postureEchocardiography

3. Non-Infectious Inflammatory Disease

CauseWhat should raise itTest that settles it
Adult-onset Still's diseaseQuotidian fever, evanescent salmon rash, arthritis, sore throat, very high ferritin, leucocytosisA diagnosis of exclusion. Yamaguchi criteria after malignancy and infection are excluded
Giant cell arteritisAge over 50, new headache, jaw claudication, scalp tenderness, visual symptoms, very high ESRTemporal artery ultrasound or biopsy. Do not delay treatment for the biopsy where vision is threatened
Systemic lupus erythematosusYoung woman, rash, serositis, cytopenias, renal involvementANA then specific antibodies and complement
Vasculitis, including TakayasuLimb claudication, pulse deficit, blood pressure difference between arms, bruitsCT or MR angiography of the aorta and branches
SarcoidosisHilar lymphadenopathy, uveitis, erythema nodosum, hypercalcaemiaTissue showing non-caseating granuloma, with tuberculosis excluded on culture
Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosisFever, cytopenias, very high ferritin, splenomegaly, high triglycerides, low fibrinogenHScore or HLH-2004 criteria, marrow showing haemophagocytosis

4. Miscellaneous and Undiagnosed

CauseWhat should raise itTest that settles it
Drug feverTemporal link to a new medicine, relative well-being despite high fever, eosinophilia, rashWithdrawal of the suspect medicine, with defervescence usually within 72 hours
ThyroiditisNeck tenderness, thyrotoxic symptoms, raised ESRThyroid function and, where needed, uptake scan. See the Thyrotoxicosis Diagnostic Pathway
Venous thromboembolismImmobility, malignancy, unilateral limb swelling, pleuritic painDoppler or CT pulmonary angiography. See the VTE Exclusion Pathway
Periodic fever syndromesOnset in childhood or early adult life, stereotyped attacks with well intervals, family historyClinical pattern, then genetic testing at a specialist centre
Factitious feverFever without tachycardia or a rise in acute phase markers, healthcare access, readings only when unobservedSimultaneous observed temperature and pulse. Approach the discussion with care and without accusation
No diagnosis reachedA substantial minority of PUO in every published seriesStructured observation with a defined review date is a legitimate plan, provided the patient is stable and improving
Evidence and Practice Points
1. What the definition is actually for

Petersdorf and Beeson set the original bar in 1961: fever above 38.3 C, which is 101 F on the charts most Indian wards actually use, on several occasions, lasting more than three weeks, and undiagnosed after a week of investigation in hospital. Durack and Street revised it in 1991, replacing the week in hospital with three outpatient visits or three days of inpatient investigation, and adding the nosocomial, neutropenic and HIV-associated categories. The purpose of the threshold is not academic. It exists to stop the expensive, low-yield investigation of fever that would have declared itself if given a fortnight.

2. Confirm the fever before investigating it

A surprising proportion of referred PUO is not PUO. Some patients have a normal circadian temperature variation misread as fever, some have measured only at home with an unreliable thermometer, and a few have no documented fever at all. Before ordering imaging, ask for temperature charted by a health worker, four hourly, alongside the pulse. A fever above 102 F (39 C) with a pulse under 90 raises relative bradycardia. A fever with no rise in pulse and no rise in acute phase markers raises the possibility that the reading itself is not genuine.

3. Tuberculosis is the first thought in India, and tissue is what settles it

Indian series consistently place infection as the largest group in classic PUO, and tuberculosis as the commonest single infection within it, much of it extrapulmonary and much of it with a normal chest radiograph. The practical consequence is that the search should be for a site to sample rather than for a blood test. Lymph node, pleura, peritoneum, marrow and liver are all more informative than another round of serology. When tissue is obtained, it must go for GeneXpert and mycobacterial culture as well as histopathology: granuloma on histology alone does not distinguish tuberculosis from sarcoidosis, fungal infection or lymphoma.

4. The clue-driven workup outperforms the checklist

Ordering every test in a long list is slower and less productive than following the clues that are present. A murmur directs to blood cultures and echocardiography. A large spleen directs to marrow and to visceral leishmaniasis in an endemic area. New headache in a patient over 50 with a very high ESR directs to the temporal artery. The corollary matters as much: when there are no clues, repeat the history and examination rather than repeating the tests. Clues appear over time, and the examination that was normal in week two is often abnormal in week four.

5. Sequence imaging, and know what each test is for

Ultrasound of the abdomen is cheap, available and reasonable first. CECT of chest and abdomen is the workhorse of second-stage imaging and finds most occult abscesses, lymphadenopathy and solid tumours. FDG PET-CT is useful where it is available and affordable, particularly for large vessel vasculitis and for identifying a site to biopsy, but it is not available in most Indian district settings and a workup should not stall waiting for it. Echocardiography answers a specific question about the valves and should be requested when there is a reason, not as a routine sweep.

6. Ferritin, and the limits of a single number

A very high ferritin will be quoted in favour of adult-onset Still's disease and of haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. It is an acute phase reactant and rises in infection, in malignancy and in liver disease as well. It is a reason to look harder at those two diagnoses, not a reason to make either of them. Still's disease in particular remains a diagnosis of exclusion, and the exclusions that matter most are lymphoma and tuberculosis.

7. Empirical therapy: what to weigh

Several empirical strategies are used in PUO, and each has arguments on both sides. Empirical antibiotics may treat a culture-negative endocarditis, but they also render subsequent cultures unhelpful. Corticosteroids may produce a striking response in giant cell arteritis or Still's disease, but they also produce a partial and temporary response in lymphoma and can allow tuberculosis to disseminate. A trial of antitubercular therapy is widely used in India, where the pretest probability of tuberculosis is high, and it may be the only practical option when tissue cannot be obtained; against that, both lymphoma and Still's disease can defervesce transiently on any of these agents, so a fall in temperature does not confirm the diagnosis, and a full course commits the patient to months of hepatotoxic treatment.

What is common to all of them is that the decision should be deliberate rather than incidental. Record what is being treated, what response would count as a success, by what date it will be judged, and what will happen if the response does not come. Where tissue can still be obtained, obtaining it before starting is almost always the more informative order.

8. The naproxen test, and its limits

A short course of naproxen has been described as separating neoplastic fever, which settles, from infective fever, which does not. It is a weak discriminator in modern series and should not be used to rule anything in or out. It appears here because it is still asked about in examinations and still occasionally used on the wards, not because it should decide management.

9. Not reaching a diagnosis is a recognised outcome

In every published series a substantial minority of PUO is never diagnosed, and most of those patients do well. Once malignancy, tuberculosis, endocarditis and the treatable inflammatory diseases have been reasonably excluded in a patient who is stable and gaining weight, structured observation with a defined review date is a legitimate plan rather than a failure. It should be communicated to the patient as such, because the alternative is an anxious search that continues indefinitely and does its own harm.

10. When this pathway is the wrong one

Fever of less than two weeks belongs in the Acute Undifferentiated Febrile Illness Pathway, which sequences investigations by day of illness and is built for the tropical infections that dominate that window. A patient who is haemodynamically unstable belongs in a sepsis pathway, not in a PUO workup, whatever the duration of fever. Neutropenic fever is a medical emergency in which the first antibiotic matters more than the diagnosis, and empirical cover should not wait for this tool.

Abbreviations: PUO (Pyrexia of Unknown Origin) · FUO (Fever of Unknown Origin, the same entity) · ANC (Absolute Neutrophil Count) · ART (Antiretroviral Therapy) · ATT (Antitubercular Therapy) · AOSD (Adult-Onset Still's Disease) · CECT (Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography) · ESR (Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate) · CRP (C-Reactive Protein) · FDG PET-CT (Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography) · GCA (Giant Cell Arteritis) · HLH (Haemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis) · IGRA (Interferon Gamma Release Assay) · IRIS (Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome) · LDH (Lactate Dehydrogenase) · NIID (Non-Infectious Inflammatory Disease) · NTEP (National Tuberculosis Elimination Programme) · PDC (Potentially Diagnostic Clue) · TOE (Transoesophageal Echocardiography)
Algorithm References & Evidence Base
  1. Petersdorf RG, Beeson PB. Fever of unexplained origin: report on 100 cases. Medicine (Baltimore). 1961;40:1-30.
  2. Durack DT, Street AC. Fever of unknown origin: reexamined and redefined. Curr Clin Top Infect Dis. 1991;11:35-51.
  3. Mulders-Manders C, Simon A, Bleeker-Rovers C. Fever of unknown origin. Clin Med (Lond). 2015;15(3):280-284.
  4. Haidar G, Singh N. Fever of Unknown Origin. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(5):463-477.
  5. Bleeker-Rovers CP, Vos FJ, de Kleijn EMHA, et al. A prospective multicenter study on fever of unknown origin: the yield of a structured diagnostic protocol. Medicine (Baltimore). 2007;86(1):26-38.
  6. Kejariwal D, Sarkar N, Chakraborti SK, Agarwal V, Roy S. Pyrexia of unknown origin: a prospective study of 100 cases. J Postgrad Med. 2001;47(2):104-107.
  7. Handa R, Singh S, Singh N, Wali JP. Pyrexia of unknown origin: a prospective study of 100 cases. J Med. 1996;27(5-6):319-326.
  8. Sharma BK, Kumari S, Varma SC, Sagar S, Singh S. Prolonged undiagnosed fever in northern India. Trop Geogr Med. 1992;44(1-2):32-36.
  9. Central TB Division, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. National Tuberculosis Elimination Programme: Training Modules and Technical and Operational Guidelines for TB Control in India. New Delhi: MoHFW.
  10. Fautrel B, Zing E, Golmard JL, et al. Proposal for a new set of classification criteria for adult-onset Still disease. Medicine (Baltimore). 2002;81(3):194-200.
  11. Fardet L, Galicier L, Lambotte O, et al. Development and validation of the HScore, a score for the diagnosis of reactive haemophagocytic syndrome. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66(9):2613-2620.
  12. Li AY, Adams-Huet B, Cutrell JB, et al. Diagnostic yield of FDG PET-CT in fever of unknown origin. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;73(11):e4374-e4382.
How to Cite This Tool

AMA Style:
Umakanth S. Pyrexia of Unknown Origin Pathway. MEDiscuss. Published 2026. Accessed .

Vancouver Style:
Umakanth S. Pyrexia of Unknown Origin Pathway [Internet]. MEDiscuss.org; 2026 [cited ]. Available from:

Category Advanced Diagnostics
Specialties Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Rheumatology
Written and maintained by Dr Shashikiran Umakanth.
Last revised: 31 July 2026